German Steel Federation President Gunnar Groebler commented: “Today’s decision sends a strong signal for steel production in Germany and Europe. Following the approval by the European Parliament, the Council is now providing clarity in time before the current safeguard measures expire at the end of June. This demonstrates the EU’s determination and shows that anyone seeking to safeguard industrial value creation, quality jobs, and climate-neutral raw material production in Europe must ensure fair competitive conditions.”
Pressure on the European steel industry is increasing
The federation noted that the new instrument comes at the right time, as the European steel industry continues to face significant pressure from uncontrolled global overcapacity, state-distorted competition in third countries, and rising protectionism in other markets. It also highlighted that around one-third of the steel used in the EU currently originates from third countries.
WV Stahl warned that without effective safeguard measures, the sector could face serious market disruptions, with potential consequences for investment, employment, and the industry's transition toward climate-friendly production.
“A balanced and intelligent safeguard mechanism”
Groebler described the measure as “a carefully designed and balanced safeguard instrument.” Rather than relying on blanket tariffs or quotas, he said the mechanism allows for controlled market access through targeted and intelligent protection measures. According to Groebler, the new framework combines the protection of EU steel production with the need for stable supply chains, while also taking into account the interests of downstream steel-processing industries.
Implementation phase begins
With the formal adoption of the measure, the focus now shifts to implementation. The federation stressed the importance of further refining the instrument to ensure its effectiveness and prevent circumvention.
One of the key priorities identified by WV Stahl is the expansion of the mechanism’s scope. The federation argued that the safeguard should cover all steel products as well as relevant products further down the value chain in order to prevent trade diversion and loopholes that could undermine the measure.
Criticism of origin rules and quota mechanism
WV Stahl also emphasized the need for the consistent implementation of the proposed “melted and poured” origin requirement. Under this approach, the determining factor should be where the steel was actually melted and poured, rather than where it may have undergone limited downstream processing. The federation argued that stronger traceability throughout the production chain is essential to reduce opportunities for circumvention.
At the same time, the federation criticized the proposed transferable quota system. According to WV Stahl, allowing unused quotas to be carried forward from one month to another could lead to a concentration of imports and create additional pressure on the EU market. The association stressed that, particularly in a fragile market environment, technical quota mechanisms should not create new distortions.
Groebler concluded: “The European Commission now has the responsibility to make this instrument practical, effective, and resistant to circumvention. The forthcoming regulations must be implemented swiftly to ensure fair competition, stable value chains, and a strong steel industry within the EU.”
He added: “Today is a good day for Europe as a steel production location. The next crucial step is to transform this important political decision into a strong and effective instrument for the future.”
Comments
No comment yet.